Tuesday, December 2, 2014
City sustainability from waste
Waste management poses a challenge and unusual opportunity for making cities sustainable. The National Association of Clean Water Agencies (US) points out that wastewater treatment uses 3% of electric power generated in the US. By applying anaerobic digestion to biosolids combined with food and food processing wastes, 6% of US electric power needs can be generated. The Blue Plains plant serving the Washington DC area is an example that is now the largest electric power user in the DC area. As the biodigesters now in place are phased in with food waste added, they will become a major generator and rate payers in the DC area will get lower water treatment bills! Food waste is the largest segment of the US solid waste stream still going to landfills where methane is generated. No organic material, no methane from landfills! Pioneers in harnessing the power of a million microorganisms per square inch are powering municipal truck fleets with natural gas from anaerobic digesters. Natural gas from waste means natural gas in the ground can stay in the ground. Opportunities that pay for themselves, reduce methane from landfills, generate renewablw electricity, and leave a digestate that can help soils to retain water, promote healthy plant root growth, reduce runoff, and enable soils to store carbon can't be all bad.City sustainability from waste
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
Clean Power Plan
The
House of Representatives passed a Federal budget for 2014-2015 that stopped
funding for EPA to work on its Clean Power Plan. Now the Senate Majority
Leader may
well be from one of the 12 coal States that is suing to stop EPA’s Clean Power
Plan. A rider to a difficult to veto budget bill might attempt to stop EPA work
on the Clean Power Plan.
The Clean Power Plan includes a goal
to reduce US emissions from the electric power by 30% below a baseline for
2005. Emissions from US electric power generation are already 15.8% below the
2005 base line in part because of a shift of about 10% of electric power
generation from coal to cheaper natural gas. Natural gas has about half the greenhouse
gas emissions of coal and 100 times the greenhouse gas emissions of renewables.
By 2016 States will develop plans to reduce electric power emissions by 2030 if
the Clean Power Plan proceeds.
The US Energy Information Agency has
predicted what will happen without the Clean Power Plan. The US will use 25%
more electric power by 2040 and the source of that power will be the same
amount of coal as is used today, the same amount of nuclear energy as is used
today, twice the renewables used today (which will provide one-third of the
increased power demanded), and enough additional natural gas to provide the
additional two-thirds of additional electric power in 2040. Instead of reducing
greenhouse gas emissions by the additional 14% needed to reach the goal of 30%
fewer emissions (than in 2005) by 2030, we would be on track to increase
emissions much closer to the 2005 baseline.
US leadership at the International
Panel on Climate Change meeting in Paris in February 2015 depends on a strong commitment
to the Clean Power Plan. Congress take note!
Clean Power Plan
Thursday, October 16, 2014
Energy and Transportation
Energy and Transportation
The Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change reported recently that emissions from transportation doubled
from 1970 to 7 gigatons of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2010. Road vehicles
accounted for 80% of this increase. The top 4 transportation sources accounted
for 92% of emissions from the transport sector:
Road 72.06%
International ad coastal shipping 9.26%
International aviation 6.52%
Domestic aviation 4.11%
In
contrast, rail contributed 1.6% of transportation emissions.
Only 10% of the global population
accounts for 80% of passenger kilometers. Passenger kilometers are up 50% from
2005 and are expected to double by 2050. Not only are road vehicles the greatest
transport sector contributor to greenhouse gasses, road vehicle kilometers are
the fastest growing member of the transport sector.
Putting the transport sector in
perspective, energy was the greatest contributor to total emissions at 34% and
agriculture, forestry, and land use was next at 24%. Transport contributed
about 14% to total emissions. For the United States, electric power was the
greatest contributor to US emissions at 38% while transport was next at 34%. Transport, and especially road vehicles, may then
be expected to grow in importance as transport becomes a greater proportion of
greenhouse gas emissions.
One might hope that the electric
power sector might experience declines that give some room for an ever
expanding transportation contribution to greenhouse gas emissions. On the
contrary, the International Energy Agency forecasts a 56% increase in electric power
by 2040 and the US Energy Information Agency forecasts a 25% increase in US electric
power by 2040. The US is currently below
2008 emissions by about 14% and would rise to just below 2008 levels as 2040
would see as much electric power generated from coal and nuclear as today while
a third of the increase of 25% by 2040 would be met by doubling generation from
renewables and two-thirds from increased use of natural gas. While natural gas
emissions are half those of coal, they are about 100 times emissions from
renewables.
The US is second in overall
greenhouse gas emissions behind China and ahead of India, the third largest
emitter nation. Yet US per capita emissions are three times per capita
emissions for China and 12 times per capita emissions for India. US leadership
in reducing emissions may therefore be center stage for progress capping the rise
in global temperature to 2 degrees. Just to focus the mind, looking at historic
data for when global temperatures were 4 degrees higher, sea levels were 18
feet higher. Looking further back to when average temperatures were 6 degrees
higher, sea levels were 120 feet higher. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change may expect current efforts to lead to a rise of 4.7 degrees. Forecasts
of the population that could be supported at an 18 foot rise in sea level are
about 1 billion people. For me, looking at ways to curb greenhouse gas
emissions are preferable to discussions of the fate of the other 8 billion or
so that will have to go.
For the US, the Clean Power Plan
that would cut electric power emissions by 30%
are a
key step. US standards for mileage for cars and light trucks to rise to 54.5
miles per gallon by model year 2025 are hopeful. US mileage has improved from
13mpg in 1975 to
19.7
mpg in 1999 and even further to 24 mpg in 2013. Yet the US has a long way to go
to catch up with the European Union at
45 miles per gallon and even higher mileage in Japan. Gas prices in the EU are about $9 per gallon and cars are much
smaller attesting to the importance of price signals. A US increase in gasoline
tax would fuel funds for infrastructure improvements and get clear results in
reduced emissions.
The Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change calls for actions to avoid energy use (walking or biking come to
mind), modal choice (rail versus ancient trucks in an improved rail network in
Africa jumps out from Jeffrey Sachs Age of Sustainable Development comparison
of the nationwide rail network in India versus the continent of Africa’s fragmented
links to various minerals and other natural resources), energy intensity (US
potential savings from energy efficiency, for example, are well documented),
and improved carbon intensity (using renewables to produce electricity may be
200 yield 200 times fewer emissions than coal).
International documentation of
success stories in each of these action areas may produce the wave of progress
that we clearly need. Let the innovation begin!energy and transportation
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
Fuel for the Home Fires of Haiti
Fueling
the Home Fires in Haiti
Haiti has about 2 million
households. Domestic energy for cooking comes from propane for about 100,000
and 50,000 use some other upscale fuel. The other 1.85 million households
(averaging 5 persons per household) use wood or charcoal for cooking. Haiti can
sustainably harvest about 500,000 tons of wood (for direct use or to make
charcoal) per year. Actual use is 4 million tons per year. Stretching a bit,
250,000 households can use wood or wood charcoal. That leaves a target of 1.6
million households to find alternative fuel
More efficient charcoal or wood
stoves which use half as much fuel could sustainably serve a half million households.
These stoves pay for themselves through fuel savings in a few months. Up front
costs are a barrier as over half of
Haitians live on less than a dollar a day and maybe 75% live on less than $2 a
day. Yet D&E Green and the International Lifeline Fund between them have
over 50,000 improved stoves in use in the Port Au Prince area.
Biofuels are an alternative that
would boost the local economy. An expert on domestic energy suggests targets of
100,000 households using ethanol and 400,000 using biomass. Ethanol virtually eliminates emissions and
leaves the user with clean hands, unlike charcoal where a shower may be needed
after use. Biomass can be in pellets which compress ingredients or briquettes
which also char the ingredients before pressing. Pellets and briquettes from
waste are especially attractive.
For ethanol and biofuels, what are
the investments needed per family, what are the
running costs, and what is the value chain of raw material, jobs, land, and
investment for their production? My
recent trip to Haiti explored both ethanol and also briquettes made from coconut
husks by my friends at Konpay. For 1.6 million households currently
deforesting Haiti, all of the above is the best approach.
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Delivering Energy for All
Delivering Energy for Development: Models for achieving energy access for the world’s poor by
Rafaella Bellanca, Ewan Bloomfield, and Kavita Rai
The International Energy Agency
projects that over a billion people will still lack access to electricity in 2030.
This well documented book gives comprehensive coverage to on grid, mini-grid,
and off grid approaches for increasing access to energy. Many tables, “boxes,”
and diagrams help to illuminate many challenges, barriers, and successful
approaches. Especially helpful is refining the UN’s Sustainable Energy for All
goals by how much electricity is considered “enough’ for households and how
much clean fuel is needed for cooking by the 2.8 billion who currently use
animal dung, crop wastes and other materials whose use results in death for 1.4
million mostly women and children each
year.
Delivering Energy for Development makes
clear the importance of energy access to serve basic human needs. Various
energy delivery models are examined for their market chain, support services,
and enabling environment. The book uses case studies from a wide variety of
places to provide best practices and lessons learned. The authors provide easy
access to a wealth of knowledge for anyone interested in sustainable energy for
all.
george garlandTuesday, September 23, 2014
Social Good Summit Day 2
Social Good
Summit Day 2
Bill McGibbon,
founder of 350.org, and Kumi Naidoo, Executive Director of Greenpeace International,
expressed low expectations for the United Nations meeting on climate for
September 23. The climate march with 300,000 participants is a successful first
step in a continuing struggle. Recognition from organized labor that jobs
depended on sensible climate action is encouraging. Ban Ki Moon’s participation
in the climate march showed good intentions. The nation States who comprise the
UN may be dominated by fossil fuel interests who forestall serious action. Bill
McGibbon noted that Chevron is the largest campaign donor and the Koch brothers
are not far behind.
Kumi Naidoo pointed
out that the earth does not need to be saved. The earth will do fine without
humans. The oceans will restore themselves and forests will flourish. The
challenge is to make the earth safe for humanity. This is consistent with Tapio
Kaninnen’s observation that a six degree increase in temperature will return
the earth to pre-ice age conditions when sea levels were 210 feet higher. Kumi
cited Mahatma Ghandi’s observation that “first they ignore you, then they laugh
at you, then they fight you, and then you win.” Kumi felt that the fight stage
had been reached and that may be good news. Bill McGibbon argued that fear of
fossil fuel companies needs to be matche or exceeded by fear of the citizenry
and only then will action be taken. Bill pointed out that we have known what to
do for 25 years. A carbon tax which gives a market signal to reduce dependence
on fossil fuels is known to be efficient and effective. My trip to Sicily where
gas is $9 per gallon combined with the prevalence of small cars on the road
backs that up. Germany was cited as perhaps the only country taking serious
action. German industry does very well and pays twice the price for
electricity.
While Walt
Kelly and Pogo were not at the summit, it’s still possible that we have met the
enemy and they is us. The world loves energy. The US Information Agency
predicts a 25% increase in energy use in the US by 2040. The International
Energy Agency predicts increase in global demand for energy by 56% by 2040. The
message that renewable energy is now price competitive and creates lots of jobs
has got to rise above the fossil fuel din.
Monday, September 22, 2014
Social Good Summit day one
My first Social Good Summit day began at the
United Nations Foundation’s Arthur Ross Conference Center. This was old home
week for me as the Southern New York State Division had hosted a climate change
event here just last week. Chris Whatley and the United Nations Association USA
had engaged 24 bloggers to add to the social media conversation which includes
140 countries in 13 languages! Many of the graduate students and young
professionals participating had founded organizations to promote issues ranging
from better use of information technology in Madagascar to improved US
understanding of China.
We
migrated to the 92nd Street Y where a Digital Media Lounge
facilitated hundreds of bloggers and tweeters heard from movers and shakers the
United Nations pillars of human rights, ending poverty, and peace and security.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres said that developing
legal ways to migrate was the best way to combat illegal migration. Cracking
down on human traffickers should get as much attention as cracking down on
illegal drug traffickers. Refugees were mostly going to developing countries
(86%) whose generosity was funding their needs. The citizen of these recipient
developing countries in turn had downward wage pressure as millions of
desperate and qualified people entered their work force and put upward pressure
on prices for housing rental and consumer goods. The High Commissioner called
for greatly increased support to address the consequences of chaotic,
unpredictable violence which met with impunity from global institutions.
The
National Capital Area United Nations Association had sent a resolution to UNA-USA
written by their Human Rights Committee co-chair Luke Lee to expand the mandate
of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) to include internally
displaced persons. Civil Society weighs in! Current US Ambassador to the UN
Semantha Power wrote Chasing the Flame which
chronicled Sergio De Mello’s work in so many international crises. “Sergio” was
an employee of UNHCR and is one of my heroes.
Graca
Machel urged looking beyond the averages. While child mortality is improving,
the 17,200 under 5 children who die of preventable causes each day remain a
concern. She noted that addressing the 50 million child brides whose human
rights are violated will take a concerted effort by the global community which
may extend over several generations. Yet these child brides represent a global target
of 50 million who have little chance of success for meeting 6 Millennium
Development Goals.
Kathy
Calvin added that girls may not even show up in statistics where they do not
get birth certificates. If you want girls to count, you need to count girls!
Social Good Summit day one
Monday, September 1, 2014
Climate Policy
The world
loves energy! The US Energy Information Agency projects a US electricity usage increase
by 2040 of 25%. The International Energy Agency (OECD) projects increased
energy use of 56% by 2040. Both
projections assume no new regulations such as the US Clean Power Plan which
would reduce greenhouse gasses from electric power by 30% by 2030. This
compares with an increase from present emissions in the do nothing projection
as coal and nuclear both are used as much in 2040 as today while renewables are
doubled (providing about one-third of the increase) and natural gas accounts
for the other two-thirds of the increased usage.
China is the biggest emitter, US second,
and India third. Perspective? US per capita emissions three times China’s and
over 12 times India’s per capita emissions.
The Obama
Administration’s announcement that it will enter “politically binding” agreements
with other countries at the UN Framework Convention of Climate Change meetings
in Paris next year is good news. Let’s take a step further with a program to
encourage voluntary increases in energy efficiency in various sectors (like we
did in garbage in days of yore)!
Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generation
Natural gas is less than half coal and 100 times more than hydro.
| https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=3001029431697074692#editor/target=post;postID=6150621338898046979
Lifecycle
greenhouse gas emissions by electricity source.
|
||
Technology
|
Description
|
50th
percentile
(g CO 2/kWhe) |
reservoir
|
4
|
|
12
|
||
various generation II reactor
types
|
16
|
|
various
|
18
|
|
22
|
||
45
|
||
46
|
||
various combined cycle turbines
without scrubbing
|
469
|
|
various generator types without
scrubbing
|
1001
|
|
carbon emissions top 10
Country
|
%
of global total
annual emissions |
Tonnes
of GHG
per capita |
23.6
|
5.13top 10 emitters
|
|
United States
|
17.9
|
16.9
|
India
|
5.5
|
1.37
|
5.3
|
10.8
|
|
Japan
|
3.8
|
8.6
|
Germany
|
2.6
|
9.2
|
1.8
|
7.3
|
|
Canada
|
1.8
|
15.4
|
1.8
|
10.6
|
|
United Kingdom
|
1.6
|
7.5
|
The US and China are clearly in the lead! US and Canada are leaders in per capita emissions.
India, number three in total emissions, is one-twelfth US per capita emissions. China is still one-third US in per capita emissions.
Sunday, August 24, 2014
scorecard
At the
opening of Peter Robinson’s photo exhibit, Alice Slater and I were
Remembering
taking The End Hunger Briefing in the 80’s and celebrating
The Hunger
Project’s success in raising global awareness as child mortality
became one
of the Millennium Development Goals. The Hunger Project
defined
ending hunger as having a national infant mortality rate below 50.
Less than
50 deaths before their first birthday per thousand live births was
equivalent
of the canary in the coal mine. The source for this statistic (and
many
others) is UNICEF’s report on the State of the World’s Children which
might be
seen as a report card on how well we are managing global good.
Back around the mid-80’s, 42,000
children (child mortality is how many die
Before
their 5th birthday) each year. The 2014 State of the World’s
Children Report (available at www.unicef.org)
cites 6.6 million child deaths from preventable causes in 2012. Dividing by 365
gives a daily rate of about 18,000. Substantial progress has been made yet having
18,000 deaths from preventable causes every day might still be called the
hidden holocaust. 56 countries have child mortality rates over 50 as of 2012.
The tpo ten are:
Sierra Leone
182 1
Angola 164 2
Chad 150 3
Somalia 147 4
Democratic
Republic of the Congo 146 5
Central
African Republic 129 6
Guinea-Bissau
129 6
Mali 128 8
Nigeria 124 9
Niger 114 10
Food is not scarce. Ability to pay
for food is scarce. For the 6 billion people on the planet, UNICEF estimates
one in five lives below the poverty line of $1.25 per day or about 1.2 billion
people. This number is about the same as the number for how many do not have
access to electricity.
Friday, August 22, 2014
LEGICUUM
Around 40 years ago under the
influence of the amazing Mary Hart and the Unitarian Church of Rockville’s inspirational
Bill Moors I participated in LEGICUUM,
Legislative Committee of Unitarian Universalists of Maryland. We worked with
State officials, including Steny Hoyer, now House of Representatives Minority
Whip, to educate the Maryland legislature. One US State Department retiree
amassed arguments that investing in more intensive parole programs was far more
cost effective than investing in prisons. His view was that the budget process
was biased in favor of capital projects at the expense of programs. It was a
lot easier to get funding for more risons than to invest in enhanced parole
rograms.
Recidivism and the demand for prison
spaces could be cut and productive lives encouraged if the State of Maryland
listened. This retiree, a member of the Cedar Lane church, said he worked on ever so many issues as a
senior US government policy analyst with
no sense that he could impact any of them He relished the opportunity to make a
difference in his home State. One of my companions at Bethany Beach this week
is a parole officer in Maryland who reports that parole programs may still be
in the back seat.
Victimless crimes such as
marijuana use and prostitution were also on LEGICUUM’s agenda. I attended a
briefing on trafficking at the UN where a young woman lawyer pointed out that
in the New York area those arranging unwilling participation were not
prosecuted while those being victimized were. Reports that Attorney General
Holder is preparing a list of those in prison under a three strikes law for
marijuana offences for Presidential pardons is an encouraging step in the right
direction. The cost to New York
taxpayers for each victimless crime incarceration is about $60,000 per year.
The principle that those who want something should never have to pay for it
sounds like socialism under the guise of “being tough on crime.”
Thursday, August 21, 2014
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)